Hupy v. Jacqueline Jeske

On September 12th, 2011 Seattle Lawyer Karma Zaike brought forth a petition for a Civil Domestic Violence Protection Order on behalf of her client Saiyin Phasavath in cause number 04-3-00375-3 SEA, normal business at KCSC, almost.

The problem on this petition is that her client Phasavath was facing a Domestic Violence Assault Charge for chocking her 14 year old son and Zaike would shortly become the subject of a criminal investigation for witness tampering by the Renton Police Department.

The petition was presented to KCSC Commissioner Carlos Velategui who denied the motion

9-12-11 DVPO Denial ExParte Signed Vealtegui

9-12-11 Phasavath DVPO ExParte Denial


Zaike then went “forum shopping” she left the 6th floor of the KCSC Courthouse and went down to the 2nd floor and was able to note this motion for a second time on the family law calendar in front of Commissioner Jackie Jeske.

By any stretch of the imagination this action could only be described as a revision the petitions were identical, no declaration as why the same motion should be reconsidered (even though this would no have been appropriate as a Commissioner has no power of review/revision).

The real problem for me is that I was included as a restrained party in this civil Domestic Violence Protection Order, a action I have never been Joined into.


10-3-11 Complaint Exhibits

10-06-11 Amended Admissions

10-06-11 Amended Complaint

10-06-11 Amended Summons

10-10-11 KCSO Return of Service KCPAO

10-24-11 Certificate of Service[1]

10-24-11 Demand for Plaintiff to File[1]

ammended return dated 10-13-11[1]


  1. Detelin Draganov says:

    Jeske is gone. She should never been there in first place. She has had caused a lot of damage and I believe that she has had developed mental issues too.

  2. sickofwacourts says:

    Jeske is not gone. She is there and she’s awful. She is totally bias and does not follow any sort of legal rules.

  3. Chris says:

    I wish more litigants who go in front of her would ask her “Where Sky Metawala is?” she is 100% responsible along with Seattle lawyer Veronica Freitas for the disappearance of that child.

    Craighead and McDermott moved her away from the public eye but now the media has moved off the missing child story she is back on family law calendar.

  4. Concerned Citizen says:

    Jeske is on the family law motions out of King County Superior Court in Kent. Total garbage and biased towards women. My ex didn’t show up to court and my “default” motion got gutted to almost nothing. Stereotypical liberal fem-nazi.

  5. Dave says:

    A comment above reminded me of the question, is coercing your own child to conceal a crime witness tampering? By my reading it is. I am not aware of any exemptions under the law.

  6. Chuck says:

    Commissioner Velategui gets it right most of the time, however the system allows ways around getting it right. It’s well known that protection orders are easy to get and many times cause prejudice against those it should protect. I’ve seen this happen many times and currently experiencing it myself. It’s instant legal abuse, considered irony by many lawyers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *